Raised Crosswalks

(Continued from Bumps, Humps, & Other Raised Pavement Areas)

Raised crosswalks are essentially broad, flat-topped speed humps that coincide with pedestrian crosswalks at street intersections. The crosswalks are raised above the level of the roadway to slow traffic, enhance crosswalk visibility, and make the crossing easier for pedestrians who may have difficulty stepping up and down curbs.

Raised Crosswalks Design Considerations:
• Can be constructed of brick, concrete block, colored asphalt or cement, with ramps striped for
better visibility.
• Raised crosswalks are applicable:
(1) On roadways with vehicular speeds perceived as being incompatible with the adjacent residential                       land uses.
(2) Where there is a significant number of pedestrian crossings.
(3) In conjunction with other traffic-calming devices, particularly entry treatments.
(4) On two-lane or fewer residential streets classified as either “local streets” or neighborhood
collector streets.”
(5) On roadways with 85th percentile speeds less than 45 mph.

Next… Intersection Humps/Raised Intersections

When any new traffic management approach is introduced, issues, concerns, and questions are bound
to arise. Design decisions related to traffic can have far-reaching consequences. Lives, economic well-being, and urban livability are directly affected.

Professional engineers, planners, government, and the public all are aware of and sensitive to proposals
for changes in the traffic environment. Roadway congestion, air quality, traffic safety, street crimes,
and the high cost of new improvements are among the most-widely debated issues in America today. New design ideas are, and should be, subjected to rigorous testing and evaluation before being accepted as
part of the standard engineering and transportation planning tool kit. Traffic calming is not a panacea for
urban transportation woes, but it can have significant benefits in many situations.

In considering the application of traffic-calming techniques, what specific issues are likely to arise? The discussion on the following pages focuses on traffic-calming issues.

1. Traffic safety.

The Issue: Encouraging people to walk, play, and bicycle in and next to the streets is just asking for trouble. They will have a false sense of security and accidents will increase. They will develop bad habits that may increase their when they leave the neighborhood.

Comment: Traffic-calming measures have been implemented in many European cities. In the Netherlands and Germany, extensive research has been conducted to evaluate the safety and impact of traffic-calming techniques and devices.
2. Impact on traffic volumes, distribution, and operations.

The Issue: Traffic calming will never work on anything except very low-volume residential streets. It will substantially reduce the amount of traffic that a street can handle efficiently and this is counterproductive.
We need to move vehicles, not restrict them.  Furthermore, if we slow traffic on one streets, the traffic will simply be diverted to another street. The net result will be increased congestion and more problems overall.

Comment: A 5-year German Federal Government evaluation of traffic calming and follow-up research
found:
• Little change in overall traffic volumes.
• Reduction in average vehicle speeds by almost 50 percent.
• Average increase in motorist trip time of only 33 seconds.

3. Lack of proven design standards.

The Issue: There are no uniform, accepted, and legally defensible standards to follow. If we want to try traffic calming, where can we get specific information about design?
Comment: Many U.S. cities are now developing and testing design guidelines for traffic-calming improvements. Although uniform, national standards have yet to evolve, valuable experience is being gained. The list of references in this blog provides a starting point for further exploration of
specific design approaches.
4. Liability.
The Issue: These traffic-calming ideas may be accepted in Europe, but they haven’t really been tried here. Are we opening the door to all kinds of legal problems if somebody crashes on a traffic circle or a speed table and sues us?

Comment: When considering the use of any new design approach, concerns about liability can be addressed somewhat through performance of “due diligence” on the part of the engineer, planner, or other professionals involved in the design. Research into the experiences of other U.S. cities, European standards, and evaluation studies should be thorough and followed up with a first-hand look if possible. Construction of a pilot project or other testing of proposed designs can benefit, as can ongoing and systematic valuation of the improvements once installed.

5. Emergency and service vehicle access.

The Issue: Construction of speed bumps, neckdowns, medians, and traffic circles will increase response times for emergency vehicles and may restrict access for garbage trucks, delivery vans, and other large vehicles.

Comment: Studies in Berkley and Palo Alto, CA, show that traffic management measures (e.g., traffic diverters, bicycle boulevards) have not impaired police or fire emergency response times. • The Seattle Engineering Department works closely with its Fire Department to design and field-test traffic circles on a site-specific basis to ensure good emergency access.
6. Impacts on bicycling.

The Issue: Pavement texturing, speed tables, wider sidewalks, “bulb-outs” at corners and similar
improvements may make things better for pedestrians, but may have a negative impact on bicycling.
Emergency vehicle access should always be considered when incorporating traffic-calming
measures.

Comment: A 5-year German Federal Government evaluation of traffic calming and follow-up research found doubling of bicycle use over a 4-year period.

• Implementation of traffic management strategies in the downtownarea of the Dutch City of Groningen contributed to a substantial increase in bicycling and walking. Bicycle use is now well over 50 percent of all trips.
• Studies of traffic-calming areas in Japan show increases in both bicycle and pedestrian traffic volumes along most routes.

This list of six traffic calming objectives comes from the U.S. Department Of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Website.

Six Main Objectives of Traffic Calming

1. To encourage public involvement in the traffic calming process by incorporating the preferences & requirements of the citizens,
2. To reduce vehicular speeds,
3. To promote safe & pleasant conditions for motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians, & residents,
4. To improve the environment & livability of neighborhood streets
5. To improve real & perceived safety for non-motorized users of the streets,
6. To discourage use of residential streets by non-citizens cut through vehicular traffic.

Sounds good in theory but how does all this work practically.  Please provide your comments and experiences.

The City of Austin, Tx has an excellent FAQ section about Speed Humps.

I’ve reproduced some of that faq here in this post but you really should visit this page where the original post occurs to get the full list of speed hump Frequently Asked Questions that they’ve posted.

These frequently asked questions about speed humps are a great resource to have at your fingertips if you are responsible for designing or specifying speed humps or even if you are considering speed humps for your own project.

Q. - Why do we have speed humps?

A. - Speeding on residential streets is a common complaint of concerned citizens. Although enforcement of speed limits by police departments is an effective means of reducing speeds, limited resources do not allow such enforcement on a regular and permanent basis. Research has shown that speed humps are an effective approach to slowing down traffic on residential streets.

Q. - What is a speed hump and how is it different from a speed bump?

A. - A speed hump is a gradual rise and fall of the pavement surface along the roadway extending across the pavement width. Generally, speed humps used on residential streets are 12 to 22 feet long with a maximum height of 3 to 4 inches. Speed “humps” are different from speed “bumps”, which are seen in many private parking lots.

A speed bump is abrupt, having a height of 3 to 4 inches over a length of 1 to 3 feet. Speed bumps cause most vehicles to slow down to almost a stop to go over it. Speed humps, on the other hand, are designed so most vehicles can go over them at 20 mph without causing driver discomfort.

Q. - How are speed humps effective in controlling speeds?

A. - Speed humps cause a gentle vehicle rocking motion that causes driver discomfort, thus resulting in most vehicles slowing down to 20 mph at each hump. Depending upon street geometry, speed humps are placed every 200 to 600 feet. The presence of speed humps causes drivers to slow down at the humps and in between properly spaced successive humps. Speed humps have the advantage of being self-enforcing. They are sometimes referred to as “sleeping police officers”.

Q. - What will happen if I go over speed humps at high speeds?

A. - At high speeds a speed hump can cause significant driver discomfort. At such speeds it can act as a bump and jolt the vehicle’s suspension and its occupants or cargo.

Q. - Do speed humps reduce cut-through traffic?

A. - The primary purpose of speed humps is to reduce the speeds of vehicles traveling along a roadway. Traffic diversion due to speed humps is a side effect which may or may not result. A possible disadvantage of speed humps is that motorists may avoid the speed humps by using other nearby streets in the area.

Q. - How is a driver warned of the presence of speed humps?

A. - On any street with speed humps, warning signs such as “Road Humps Ahead” are placed before the beginning of each series of humps. These signs also indicate the speed at which drivers are advised to travel over the hump. To be properly visible, the speed hump is marked with diagonal white stripes.

Q. - Can speed humps be placed on any street?

A. - Speed humps are placed only on residential streets with not more than two lanes and with a speed limit of 30 mph or less. For safety reasons, speed humps are not installed within sections which are curved or where the street slopes uphill/downhill.

Speed humps are not typically installed on streets where emergency facilities are located. The Department of Public Works and Transportation communicates with the Austin Fire Department and Emergency Medical Services to ensure that the speed humps will not greatly impact their services. Increases in response time of approximately 2-10 seconds per hump may exist with the installation of speed humps.

This is not by any means a comprehensive list of FAQ’s about speed humps but it certainly covers the basic questions asked about speed humps.  The answers too are as related to the public works division of a local US city government but for the most part these answers to frequently asked questions about speed humps can aid in understanding the issues involved with speed humps.